PaymentHub
B2B Services

Streamlined payment operations for service-oriented businesses.

Built for service companies running NetSuite, Dynamics, and Sage. Recurring billing automation, client self-service portal, relationship-calibrated collections, and multi-gateway consolidation. Live in 6-8 weeks.

The B2B Services Payment Landscape

Fragmented billing across projects, retainers, and engagement types

Manual collections consuming staff time while straining client relationships

Clients lacking self-service access to invoices and payment options

Multiple gateway dependencies creating fragmented reconciliation

Reconciliation across recurring and project payments requiring manual intervention

Key Challenges in B2B Services

Fragmented billing across engagement types creates invoicing overhead and error risk

B2B service companies bill clients through multiple models simultaneously: a client may have a monthly retainer, two active projects billed on milestones, and a time-and-materials engagement billed weekly. Each billing stream generates invoices on different schedules with different calculations. Finance teams running Oracle NetSuite or Dynamics 365 BC manage this manually — reviewing engagement records, calculating amounts, generating invoices, and sending them. The invoicing process consumes 15-25 hours per billing cycle and introduces errors that damage client relationships. PaymentHub automates invoice generation from engagement schedules: retainer invoices generate on their monthly cycle, milestone invoices trigger when milestones are marked complete, and T&M invoices calculate from approved time records — all posting to the ERP automatically.

Collections must respect relationship dynamics that generic dunning ignores

Professional service companies face a collections challenge unique to their business model: aggressive dunning can damage the client relationship that generates future revenue. Sending the same automated past-due notice to a $100,000/year retainer client as to a one-time project client risks alienating a relationship with significant lifetime value. AR teams at service companies make judgment calls about when and how to follow up — a manual process that does not scale. A company with 200 active clients and 800 open invoices cannot maintain personalized collections without significant AR staff. PaymentHub addresses this through segment-based collections: retainer clients receive softer reminders with longer grace periods, escalation paths route to engagement managers before formal collections, and autopay enrollment reduces the need for active collections on recurring engagements.

Client self-service expectations are unmet, generating administrative overhead

Service company clients — procurement teams, department heads, AP clerks — need access to invoice copies, payment history, and account statements for their own internal processes. When the only option is to email the service company's AR team, both sides waste time on administrative requests. Sage 100 and Sage 300 service companies without a client portal handle dozens of invoice copy and statement requests per month. PaymentHub deploys a client payment portal where authorized users view all invoices, make payments, download statements, access payment history, and manage payment methods — reducing administrative request volume by 60-80%.

Multi-gateway fragmentation creates triple reconciliation effort

Service companies accepting credit cards, ACH, and wire transfers often process each through separate providers: cards through one processor, ACH through a bank integration, and wires through the banking portal. Each has separate reporting, separate fees, and separate reconciliation. A service company processing 500 payments monthly through three sources faces a reconciliation burden that triples because each source must be matched to ERP invoices independently. PaymentHub consolidates all payment methods through a single orchestration layer with unified reconciliation — cards, ACH, and wire payments all flow through consistent invoice-level matching and ERP posting.

Mixed billing types — recurring and project — complicate payment matching

The combination of recurring billing (predictable amounts, regular timing) and project billing (variable amounts, irregular timing) creates matching complexity. A bank deposit of $47,250 might include a $5,000 retainer payment, a $12,250 milestone payment, and a $30,000 T&M payment across different clients. Matching this without invoice-level context requires manual review that consumes 15-20 hours monthly. Acumatica and NetSuite service companies are particularly affected because their billing structures support multiple engagement types but the payment integration does not carry the invoice context needed for automated matching. PaymentHub captures invoice-level context at payment time, enabling automated matching regardless of billing type.

PaymentHub Solutions for B2B Services

Key Platform Features

ERP Integrations

Industry Benchmarks

60-80%

reduction in manual invoicing effort

Typical improvement when recurring and project billing automate from engagement schedules

6-8

weeks to go-live

For standard B2B services implementation with client portal, recurring billing, and single ERP integration

15-20hrs

monthly reconciliation time saved

Reduction in manual payment matching across recurring and project billing types

See PaymentHub built for B2B Services.

Book a Payments Blueprint call and get a live demo mapped to your industry's specific workflows and ERP system.

Frequently Asked Questions — B2B Services Payments

Get your tailored implementation plan.

A Payments Blueprint call delivers a written roadmap specific to your industry's workflows, ERP, and go-live timeline.